Fourier transforms of Gibbs measures for the Gauss map

We investigate under which conditions a given invariant measure $\mu$ for the dynamical system defined by the Gauss map $x \mapsto 1/x \mod 1$ is a Rajchman measure with polynomially decaying Fourier transform $$|\widehat{\mu}(\xi)| = O(|\xi|^{-\eta}), \quad \text{as } |\xi| \to \infty.$$ We show that this property holds for any Gibbs measure $\mu$ of Hausdorff dimension greater than $1/2$ with a natural large deviation assumption on the Gibbs potential. In particular, we obtain the result for the Hausdorff measure and all Gibbs measures of dimension greater than $1/2$ on badly approximable numbers, which extends the constructions of Kaufman and Queff\'elec-Ramar\'e. Our main result implies that the Fourier-Stieltjes coefficients of the Minkowski's question mark function decay to $0$ polynomially answering a question of Salem from 1943. As an application of the Davenport-Erd\H{o}s-LeVeque criterion we obtain an equidistribution theorem for Gibbs measures, which extends in part a recent result by Hochman-Shmerkin. Our proofs are based on exploiting the nonlinear and number theoretic nature of the Gauss map and large deviation theory for Hausdorff dimension and Lyapunov exponents.Comment: v3: 29 pages; peer-reviewed version, fixes typos and added more elaborations, and included comments on Salem's problem. To appear in Math. An

Properties of measures supported on fat Sierpinski carpets

In this paper we study certain conformal iterated function schemes in two dimensions that are natural generalizations of the Sierpinski carpet construction. In particular, we consider scaling factors for which the open set condition fails. For such ‘fat Sierpinski carpets’ we study the range of parameters for which the dimension of the set is exactly known, or for which the set has positive measure

What is tested when experiments test that quantum dynamics is linear

Experiments that look for nonlinear quantum dynamics test the fundamental premise of physics that one of two separate systems can influence the physical behavior of the other only if there is a force between them, an interaction that involves momentum and energy. The premise is tested because it is the assumption of a proof that quantum dynamics must be linear. Here variations of a familiar example are used to show how results of nonlinear dynamics in one system can depend on correlations with the other. Effects of one system on the other, influence without interaction between separate systems, not previously considered possible, would be expected with nonlinear quantum dynamics. Whether it is possible or not is subject to experimental tests together with the linearity of quantum dynamics. Concluding comments and questions consider directions our thinking might take in response to this surprising unprecedented situation.Comment: 14 pages, Title changed, sentences adde